UK Column News - Wednesday, 31st August 2022 00:30 - Confused Government Vaccine Advice

 

UK Column News - Wednesday, 31st August 2022

Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson, David Scott, Alex Thomson and Debi Evans with today’s UK Column News.

UK Column News - Wednesday, 31st August 2022 00:30 - Confused Government Vaccine Advice

Sources:
*******************

EW Article: - https://bit.ly/3wHMabC

LAV Article: - https://bit.ly/3pWYVvd

DHSC Tweet: - https://bit.ly/3B2Jvfa

Gov't Assessment: - https://bit.ly/3Q2W2Uu

N1-methylpseudouridine: - https://bit.ly/3TxYFAk

MHRA Statement: - https://bit.ly/3R8Gyj8

NHS Scotland Assessment: - https://bit.ly/3B3Fck5

Chief Midwife Advice: - https://bit.ly/3B1lbKL

Bumps Advice: - https://bit.ly/3Q4fU9H

RCOG Advice: - https://bit.ly/3QiZbzH

BBC Advice: - https://bit.ly/3Q4XlCn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a) there is no such risk, Mr. Whitty, and b)if it is true that there was such a risk, this medical substance could not be claimed as being both safe and effective because there is no such evidence that confirms of this claim because no such trial and study supports this. This new information should have been disclosed before the time women took these substances as opposed to psychologically manipulating and exploiting them!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Scott: [Clearly, there's been a change in the government advice. When did this happen? When that change was made, what data was it based on? Was that data substantial? Did the data include risk assessment or not? If the data was not sufficient (which is likely), why was the decision made? Was it made in order to bolster the general SAGE motivated psychological manipulation of the population as a whole to get vaccinated? Did they take the decision to say to all women under forty there's a risk here, it's unacceptable if you are pregnant or might get pregnant, don't take the vaccine?; That they took the view that that would undermine the whole vaccination programme and undermine the messaging and therefore they took the decision? Or did they take the decision based on objective rigorously analyzed data with a quantitative risk assessment? We all need to know what caused this decision!]

Brian: [This is malicious! Women and children are being harmed! We need answers from the MHRA and the Commission on Human Medicines!]