UK Column News - Friday, 20th January 2023 1:06:22 - Online Safety Bill—Criminal Convictions Contain Contradictions

 

UK Column News - Friday, 20th January 2023 1:06:22 - Online Safety Bill—Criminal Convictions Contain Contradictions

1:06:22 Online Safety Bill—Government Bill

Documents, publications and announcements relating to the Government's Online Safety Bill

Digital Secretary Michelle Donelan writes to parents, setting out how the Online Safety Bill will keep children safe

Michelle Donelan: The Online Safety Bill. “Legal But Harmful” had to go

Social media giants have no right to tell adults what legal content they can or cannot see, and neither does the Government.

For adults, my new ‘triple shield’ mechanism delivers choice. Where content is illegal, clearly it should be removed. If a platform says in its terms and conditions that it does not allow certain content, they must keep that promise and remove it.

Online Safety Update Statement made on 17 January 2023

Greta Thunberg: German police deny protest detainment was staged

Sir Christopher Chope’s Covid–19 Vaccine Damage Bill Private Member's Bill (Presentation Bill)

Covid–19 Vaccine Diagnosis and Treatment Bill Private Member's Bill (Presentation Bill)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2+2=? : Who's to judge whether the content broadcast is shown in a "positive" or "negative" light? How is it going to be construed as such when one is trying to merely report facts and important information in the public's interest?

What about all the propaganda for the promotion of the covid jabs ("positive") or the covid fear-mongering ("negative")? Even when many of us thought this was "harmful" and "exploitative" we put up with it and saw it for what it was - i.e. "propaganda". Should such propaganda have been banned or perhaps the censoring of the counter narrative (e.g. important, relevant, and appropriate content) have been banned instead?

Were the government and all those that supported the government's narrative not aiding, abetting, conspiring, counseling, etc the public into taking an experimental medical substance? 

 

 

 

 

The BBC are the "single source of truth"!